<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Few Drawbacks to Ethanol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/a-few-drawbacks-to-ethanol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/a-few-drawbacks-to-ethanol/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:29:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Vander Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/a-few-drawbacks-to-ethanol/comment-page-1/#comment-3214</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Vander Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/a-few-drawbacks-to-ethanol/#comment-3214</guid>
		<description>If I run 10% ethanol fuel in my truck, I get 20% worse mpg. So if I would use the 10% mix, I would need to use more gas. If I only lost 10%, I still wouldn&#039;t like ethanol, but it least I wouldn&#039;t be burning more gas. I thought the point of using ethanol was so we wouldn&#039;t use as much gas. I have heard other people say they lose between 15 to 20% mph. Has anyone else seen this decrease? If so, isn&#039;t this the opposite of what we wanted, and how to we fix it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I run 10% ethanol fuel in my truck, I get 20% worse mpg. So if I would use the 10% mix, I would need to use more gas. If I only lost 10%, I still wouldn&#8217;t like ethanol, but it least I wouldn&#8217;t be burning more gas. I thought the point of using ethanol was so we wouldn&#8217;t use as much gas. I have heard other people say they lose between 15 to 20% mph. Has anyone else seen this decrease? If so, isn&#8217;t this the opposite of what we wanted, and how to we fix it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
