<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Environmental Performance Index</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/environmental-performance-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/environmental-performance-index/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:04:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joaquin  Orrantia</title>
		<link>http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/environmental-performance-index/comment-page-1/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>Joaquin  Orrantia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/environmental-performance-index/#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>Ecuador was ranked 22th ??? or not??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ecuador was ranked 22th ??? or not??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias Aldaron</title>
		<link>http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/environmental-performance-index/comment-page-1/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias Aldaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/environmental-performance-index/#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>EPI is what happens when you uncouple actual level of environmental impacts, by population or by raw numbers, and run it by country instead. The 25% climate change seems to be good but not the other ones.

I feel this is another intellectual: &quot;Oh we in the west are doing all we can. We are so good. Let&#039;s go help those poor people in africa&quot;. While in raw numbers and/or weighted by population we pollute on the order of thousands to million times more.

I wish people, and especially intellectuals, would stop doing this kind of feel good stuff. We have a real problem and we need to deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EPI is what happens when you uncouple actual level of environmental impacts, by population or by raw numbers, and run it by country instead. The 25% climate change seems to be good but not the other ones.</p>
<p>I feel this is another intellectual: &#8220;Oh we in the west are doing all we can. We are so good. Let&#8217;s go help those poor people in africa&#8221;. While in raw numbers and/or weighted by population we pollute on the order of thousands to million times more.</p>
<p>I wish people, and especially intellectuals, would stop doing this kind of feel good stuff. We have a real problem and we need to deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

