<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starbucks&#8217; designing a greener store format</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/starbucks-designing-a-greener/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/starbucks-designing-a-greener/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:29:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geothermal heat pump</title>
		<link>http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/starbucks-designing-a-greener/comment-page-1/#comment-2452</link>
		<dc:creator>Geothermal heat pump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/starbucks-designing-a-greener-store-format/#comment-2452</guid>
		<description>Deforestation is one of the biggest components of carbon output, in that if there are fewer trees, there are fewer places for the carbon dioxide to be absorbed and used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deforestation is one of the biggest components of carbon output, in that if there are fewer trees, there are fewer places for the carbon dioxide to be absorbed and used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misty skye</title>
		<link>http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/starbucks-designing-a-greener/comment-page-1/#comment-1408</link>
		<dc:creator>Misty skye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/starbucks-designing-a-greener-store-format/#comment-1408</guid>
		<description>Yea they will probably throw all their old &quot;non-sustainable&quot; stuff in the landfill while switching to the &quot;posh&quot; version of eco-friendliness.
They still use a lot of paper, albeit recycled, and they encourage people to waste by providing so much disposables.  
In my opinion, they should stop providing the to-go cup and make their customers use the $20 mugs they sale.  If people are willing to pay $5 for a latte, they can afford the investment anyway.  I doubt that Starbucks would lose too many customers, because drive-thru coffee is just so handy!
I am sure there is a lot more they could do, like compost their coffee grounds and sell it at a crazy markup (like their coffee).  And possibly requiring the use of CFL&#039;s and what-not, but they are likely just planning really expensive remodels that will likely make their prices higher and generate a lot of waste during construction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea they will probably throw all their old &#8220;non-sustainable&#8221; stuff in the landfill while switching to the &#8220;posh&#8221; version of eco-friendliness.<br />
They still use a lot of paper, albeit recycled, and they encourage people to waste by providing so much disposables.<br />
In my opinion, they should stop providing the to-go cup and make their customers use the $20 mugs they sale.  If people are willing to pay $5 for a latte, they can afford the investment anyway.  I doubt that Starbucks would lose too many customers, because drive-thru coffee is just so handy!<br />
I am sure there is a lot more they could do, like compost their coffee grounds and sell it at a crazy markup (like their coffee).  And possibly requiring the use of CFL&#8217;s and what-not, but they are likely just planning really expensive remodels that will likely make their prices higher and generate a lot of waste during construction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
